Computational Mapping of Pathogenic Variants in the Fas/Fas Ligand Apoptotic Pathway

Computational mapping in Fas/Fas ligand

Authors

  • Amna Ayub 3Biopharmaceuticals and Biomarkers Discovery Lab., School of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of the Punjab, Lahore-54590, Pakistan
  • Khulod Ibraheem Department of Food Science and Quality Control, University of Sulaimani, Iraq
  • Prof. Dr. Saima Sadaf Biopharmaceuticals and Biomarkers Discovery Lab, School of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

Keywords:

Autoimmune disorders, Immune homeostasis, Fas receptor, Missense Mutations, Pathogenicity, Computational tools

Abstract

Background: The Fas receptor (FAS) and its ligand (FASLG) are key regulators of the extrinsic apoptotic pathway, play essential role in immune homeostasis. Their genetic alterations disrupt apoptotic signaling and contribute to autoimmune disorders, and cancer.
Objective: This study was designed to perform a comprehensive in-silico analysis to identify pathogenic missense variants in FAS and FASLG and to evaluate their structure-functional consequences.
Methodology: 12 different pathogenicity prediction tools were used to screen 392 missense variants of FAS and structural modeling was performed. Interaction analyses was performed with GeneMANIA and COACH.
Results: We identified G112S (rs2133504146) as the deleterious variant. Consensus filtering initially highlighted 82 risk-associated variants, including C85Y (rs2133502994), C119Y (rs2133513826), and C127G (rs1848386782). Structural modeling confirmed conformational alterations and disulfide bond loss in these variants. Similarly, 258 missense variants in FASLG were analyzed and were narrowed down to 44 high-confidence pathogenic variants. Among these, N184K (rs771262843), N250D (rs1659251672), and N260K (rs761374744) were predicted to abrogate N-glycosylation sites within the TNF homology domain, potentially impairing ligand function. Pathogenic FAS variants were predominantly localized to the extracellular ligand-binding domain, whereas those in FASLG clustered within the TNF homology region.

Conclusion: Collectively, this work delineates key pathogenic variants within the FAS/FASLG axis, provides mechanistic insights into how disrupted apoptosis contributes to immune dysregulation, and sets a foundation for their future experimental validation.

Author Biographies

Amna Ayub, 3Biopharmaceuticals and Biomarkers Discovery Lab., School of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of the Punjab, Lahore-54590, Pakistan

Student at School of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of the Punjab

Khulod Ibraheem , Department of Food Science and Quality Control, University of Sulaimani, Iraq

Faculty member at the Department of Food Science and Quality Control, University of Sulaimani, Iraq

Prof. Dr. Saima Sadaf, Biopharmaceuticals and Biomarkers Discovery Lab, School of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

Professor at the School of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan. 

References

Chowdhury I, Tharakan B, Bhat GK. Current concepts in apoptosis: the physiological suicide program revisited. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2006;11:506–525. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11658-006-0041-3

Kiraz Y, Adan A, Kartal Yandim M, Baran Y. Major apoptotic mechanisms and genes involved in apoptosis. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:8471–8486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-5035-9

Koshkina N, Yang Y, Kleinerman ES. The Fas/FasL signaling pathway: its role in the metastatic process and as a target for treating osteosarcoma lung metastases. In: Current Advances in the Science of Osteosarcoma. 2020. p. 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43085-6_12

Aggarwal BB, Singh S, LaPushin R, Totpal K. Fas antigen signals proliferation of normal human diploid fibroblast and its mechanism is different from tumor necrosis factor receptor. FEBS Lett. 1995;364(1):5–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(95)00339-B

Arakaki R, Yamada A, Kudo Y, Hayashi Y, Ishimaru N. Mechanism of activation-induced cell death of T cells and regulation of FasL expression. Crit Rev Immunol. 2014;34(4). https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevImmunol.2014009988

Janda A, Schwarz K, van der Burg M, Vach W, Ijspeert H, Lorenz MR, et al. Disturbed B-lymphocyte selection in autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome. Blood. 2016;127(18):2193–2202. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-04-642488

Magerus-Chatinet A, Neven B, Stolzenberg MC, Daussy C, Arkwright PD, Lanzarotti N, et al. Onset of autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome in humans as a consequence of genetic defect accumulation. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(1):106–112. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI43752

Agrebi N, Ben-Mansour LS, Medhaffar M, Hadiji S, Fedhila F, Ben-Ali M, et al. Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome caused by homozygous FAS mutations with normal or residual protein expression. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140(1):298–301.e293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.11.033

Kimura M, Matsuzawa A. Autoimmunity in mice bearing lprcs: a novel mutant gene. Int Rev Immunol. 1994;11(3):193–210. https://doi.org/10.3109/08830189409061727

Davidson WF, Giese T, Fredrickson TN. Spontaneous development of plasmacytoid tumors in mice with defective Fas-Fas ligand interactions. J Exp Med. 1998;187(11):1825–1838. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.187.11.1825

Hughes MA, Harper N, Butterworth M, Cain K, Cohen GM, MacFarlane M. Reconstitution of the death-inducing signaling complex reveals a substrate switch that determines CD95-mediated death or survival. Mol Cell. 2009;35(3):265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06.012

Guégan JP, Legembre P. Nonapoptotic functions of Fas/CD95 in the immune response. FEBS J. 2018;285(5):809–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.14292

Karki R, Pandya D, Elston RC, Ferlini C. Defining mutation and polymorphism in the era of personal genomics. BMC Med Genomics.2015;8:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-015-0115-z

Li B, Krishnan VG, Mort ME, Xin F, Kamati KK, Cooper DN, et al. Automated inference of molecular mechanisms of disease from amino acid substitutions. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(21):2744–2750. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp528

Tahir S, Rahim J, Sadaf S. In-silico prioritization of pathogenic interleukin-37b variants and a fusion platform for high-yield soluble production. Biochimie. 2025;238(Pt B):102–111.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2025.07.026 16. Aggarwal BB. Signalling pathways of the TNF superfamily: a double-edged sword. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(9):745–756.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1184

Croft M, Salek-Ardakani S, Ware CF. Targeting the TNF and TNFR superfamilies in autoimmune disease and cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2024:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-024-01053-9

De Bielke MGS, Yancoski J, Rocco C, Pérez LE, Cantisano C, Pérez N, et al. A missense mutation in the extracellular domain of Fas: founder effect in Argentinean ALPS patients. J Clin Immunol.2012;32(6):1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-012-9731-y

Li C, Larson D, Zhang Z, Liu Z, Strom SS, Gershenwald JE, et al. Polymorphisms of the FAS and FAS ligand genes associated with risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Pharmacogenet Genomics.2006;16(4):253–263. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.fpc.0000199501.54466.de

Erdogan M, Kulaksizoglu M, Ganidagli S, Berdeli A. Fas/FasL gene polymorphism in patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis in Turkish population. J Endocrinol Invest. 2017;40:77–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-016-0534-5

Gormus U, Ergen A, Yaylim-Eraltan I, Yilmaz H, Turna A, Bozkurt N, Isbir T. Fas-1377 A/G polymorphism in lung cancer. In Vivo. 2007;21(4):663–666.

Farre L, Bittencourt A, Silva-Santos G, Almeida A, Silva A, Decanine D, et al. Fas–670 promoter polymorphism is associated with susceptibility, clinical presentation, and survival in adult T cell leukemia. J Leukoc Biol. 2008;83(1):220–222. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0407198

Duarte AJ, Ribeiro D, Moreira L, Amaral O. In silico analysis of missense mutations as a first step in functional studies: examples from two sphingolipidoses. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(11):3409. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113409

Garcia FAO, De Andrade ES, Palmero EI. Insights on variant analysis in silico tools for pathogenicity prediction. Front Genet. 2022;13:1010327. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.1010327

Pasha U, Hanif K, Nisar H, et al. A novel missense compound heterozygous variant in TLR1 gene associated with susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2023;42:3097–3111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-023-06702-9

Pasha U, Nisar H, Nisar H, Abid R, Ashraf NM, Sadaf S. Molecular dynamic simulations of missense mutation in PTPN22 and predisposition to rheumatoid arthritis. J Interferon Cytokine Res.2023;43(3):121–132. https://doi.org/10.1089/jir.2022.0216

Dobson CM. Protein folding and misfolding. Nature. 2003;426(6968):884–890. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02261

Dowdell KC, Niemela JE, Price S, Davis J, Hornung RL, Oliveira JB, et al. Somatic FAS mutations in genetically undefined autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome. Blood. 2010;115(25):5164–5169. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-01-263145

Choi C, Benveniste EN. Fas ligand/Fas system in the brain: regulator of immune and apoptotic responses. Brain Res Rev. 2004;44(1):65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2003.08.007

Hosseinalizadeh H, Rabiee F, Eghbalifard N, Rajabi H, Klionsky DJ, Rezaee A. Regulating regulatory T cells as cell therapies in autoimmunity and cancer. Front Med. 2023;10:1244298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1244298

Fernald GH, Capriotti E, Daneshjou R, Karczewski KJ, Altman RB. Bioinformatics challenges for personalized medicine. Bioinformatics.2011;27(13):1741–1748. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr295

Downloads

Published

2025-12-24