Comparison of Mulligan’s Spinal Mobilization with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Technique on Pain, Disability and Range of Motion in Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Authors

  • Muhammad Azeem Tajdin Physiotherapist, Al-Fazal Hospital Nankana Sahib, Punjab, Pakistan

Abstract

Background: Cervical radiculopathy involves response, motion and sensational changes e.g. radiating pain, paresthesia, numbness that can be raised by bad positions and motions of neck.

Objective: To determine spinal mobilization and proprioceptive neuro-muscular facilitation comparison on the pain, level of disability and movements ranges in cervical radiculopathy individuals.

Methodology: The 38 subjects (determined by G*Power 3.1.9.7) divided in 2 groups by lottery method. Control group got Mulligan’s spinal mobilization with arm movements (6 glides three sets) and experimental group received Proprioceptive neuro-muscular facilitation contract relax technique, passive stretching (3 bunches of 10 times repeat) and isometric exercises (2 clusters of 10 times repeat). Numeric pain rating scale for the pain, neck disability index for the level of disability and goniometer for the range of motion outcome measures included. Data analysis was achieved by SPSS (statistical package for social sciences) version 26. (Clinical Trial Registry Number: NCT06866821)

Results: There were 15 males (39.5%), 23 females (60.5%) with right side involved in 24 (63.2%) and left side involved in 14 (36.8%) individuals. The mean, standard deviation of age was 33.95±7.935 years and of duration symptoms were 8.08±1.402 months. There was statistically significant enhancement in NPRS, NDI and cervical ROM pre & post mean values more in experimental group as compared to control group with P value <0.001.

Conclusion: The individuals managed by proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation contract relax technique, passive stretching and isometric strengthening exercises had significantly better relief in the pain, level of disability and change in cervical ranges of movements than control group.

Keywords: Cervical Radiculopathy, Pain, Range of motion, Distraction and Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation.

References

Thoomes E, Thoomes-de Graaf M, Cleland JA, Gallina A, Falla D. Timing of evidence-based nonsurgical interventions as part of multimodal treatment guidelines for the management of cervical radiculopathy: a Delphi study. Physical Therapy. 2022;102(5):pzab312.

SHADY N, NEGM HM, ZITOUN ZMY, ABDELHAKIEM NM. Multimodal intervention of high laser with neurodynamic mobilization in cervical radiculopathy. Pjmhs; 2021.

Rhajib MAN, Islam MW, Hossain MZ, Rahman E. Evidence based physiotherapy management of a cervical radiculopathy patient by using clinical reasoning process. Journal of Spine Research and Surgery. 2022;4(2):54-62.

Savva C, Giakas G, Efstathiou M, Karagiannis C, Mamais I. Effectiveness of neural mobilization with intermittent cervical traction in the management of cervical radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2016;21:19-28.

Savva C, Korakakis V, Efstathiou M, Karagiannis C. Cervical traction combined with neural mobilization for patients with cervical radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2021;26:279-89.

Yun Y-H, Lee B-K, Yi J-H, Seo D-K. Effect of nerve mobilization with intermittent cervical segment traction on pain, range of motion, endurance, and disability of cervical radiculopathy. Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science. 2020;9(3):149-54.

Rafiq S, Zafar H, Gillani SA, Waqas MS, Zia A, Liaqat S, et al. Comparison of neural mobilization and conservative treatment on pain, range of motion, and disability in cervical radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial. PloS one. 2022;17(12):e0278177.

Ayub A, Osama M, Shakil-ur-Rehman, Ahmad S. Effects of active versus passive upper extremity neural mobilization combined with mechanical traction and joint mobilization in females with cervical radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 2019;32(5):725-30.

Wachidah RN, Herawati I, editors. Physiotherapy management for cervical radiculopathy: A case study. Academic Physiotherapy Conference Proceeding; 2021.

Rafiq S, Zafar H, Gillani SA, Waqas MS, Zia A, Liaqat S, et al. Effectiveness of neural mobilization on pain, range of motion, and disability in cervical radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial. 2021.

Alshami AM, Bamhair DA. Effect of manual therapy with exercise in patients with chronic cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2021;22(1):1-12.

Baumann A, Fisher L, Baumann AN. Addition of McKenzie exercises to a multimodal physical therapy approach for cervical radiculopathy: a case report. Cureus. 2022;14(12).

Young IA, Pozzi F, Dunning J, Linkonis R, Michener LA. Immediate and short-term effects of thoracic spine manipulation in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2019;49(5):299-309.

Shady N, Negm HM, Zitoun ZY, Abdelhakiem NM. Multimodal intervention of high-intensity laser with neurodynamic mobilization in cervical radiculopathy. Pak J Med Amp Health Sci. 2020;14(4).

Taneja D, Saharan A, Ranjeeta W, Sharma M, Saharan M, Dubey S, et al. Effect of Mulligan’s Smwam among Subjects with UnilateralCervical Radiculopathy. Eduzone: International Peer Reviewed/Refereed Multidisciplinary Journal. 2023;12(1):11-22.

Arul Pragassame S, Karthikeyan S, Sarumathi M. Effectiveness of Mulligan spinal mobilization with arm movement (SMWAM) technique along with neurodynamics in cervical radiculopathy patients-An experimental study. 2021.

Ashfaq M, Babur MN, Malick WH, Hussain MA, Awan WA. Comparative effectiveness of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and passive vertebral mobilization for neck disability in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2022;31:16-21.

Bansal R, Paul M. Effectiveness of motor control therapeutic exercise vs. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation in subjects with cervical spondylosis on pain and functional disability. Int J Physiother Res. 2020;8(5):3620-27.

Nassif AA, Amin FS, Rezkallah SS, Hassan A. Effect of spinal mobilization with arm movements on kinesthetic awareness in patient with chronic cervical radiculopathy: Randomized controlled trial. Fizjoterapia Polska. 2020;20(5):6-11.

Gashi AI, Kovačič T, Gashi F, Azemi A. The effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation technique on treating cervical radiculopathy. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2023;23(3):722-9.

Shafique S, Ahmad S, Shakil-Ur-Rehman S. Effect of Mulligan spinal mobilization with arm movement along with neurodynamics and manual traction in cervical radiculopathy patients: A randomized controlled trial. JPMA. 2019;69:1601

Kamal AS, Zakaria HM, Elsamra MK, Gaballah MA, Elrewainy RM. Efficacy of proprioceptive training paradigm on cervical radiculopathy. Assessment. 2023;1000(2):12.

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

1.
Tajdin MA. Comparison of Mulligan’s Spinal Mobilization with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Technique on Pain, Disability and Range of Motion in Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Riphah Coll. Rehabili. sci. [Internet]. 2026Jun.29 [cited 2026Jun.30];14(2). Available from: https://journals.riphah.edu.pk/index.php/jrcrs/article/view/2857

Issue

Section

Original Articles