Effect of Lumber Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides on Lower Cross Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors

  • Amreen Shabbir Lectuter, Mohi-u-Din Institute of rehabilitation sciences, Mohi-u-Din-Islamic University, Mirpur Ajk, Pakistan
  • Sidra Asghar Lectuter, Mohi-u-Din Institute of rehabilitation sciences, Mohi-u-Din-Islamic University, Mirpur Ajk, Pakistan
  • Rabbiya Atta Qazi Assistant Professor, Mohi-u-Din Institute of rehabilitation sciences, Mohi-u-Din-Islamic University, Mirpur Ajk, Pakistan
  • Aniqa Khalid Lectuter, Mohi-u-Din Institute of rehabilitation sciences, Mohi-u-Din-Islamic University, Mirpur Ajk, Pakistan
  • Jassia Ramzan Lectuter, Mohi-u-Din Institute of rehabilitation sciences, Mohi-u-Din-Islamic University, Mirpur Ajk, Pakistan
  • Ayesha Saddiqa Lectuter, Mohi-u-Din Institute of rehabilitation sciences, Mohi-u-Din-Islamic University, Mirpur Ajk, Pakistan

Abstract

Background: Lower cross syndrome, also referred to as pelvic crossed syndrome, develops when insufficient muscle strength causes an imbalance in the lower extremities. It is marked by a pattern of weakness and tightness between opposing muscle groups on the front and back of the body. Lumbar sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) are a mobilization technique used to reduce pain, correct hypomobility and biomechanical faults such as anterior pelvic tilt and hyperlordosis, and improve posture and function.

Objective: To determine the effect of lumbar SNAGs on pain and hypomobility in individuals with Lower Cross Syndrome.

Methodology: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Gulam Abbas Orthopedic Hospital, kotli, Azad Kashmir and the District Headquarter Hospital, kotli Azad Kashmir, with a sample size of 36 participants determined by G*Power (effect size 0.25, α = 0.05, power = 0.95). Participants were allocated into two group using non-probability purposive sampling technique Group A (lumbar SNAGs plus moist heat, stretching tight erector spinae, hip flexors and strengthening of weak abdominals and gluteal muscles) and Group B (moist heat with stretching tight erector spinae, hip flexors and strengthening of weak abdominals and gluteal muscles only, with 5-7 reps of 1 set of each exercise, delivered three times a week for three weeks. Pain was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and lumbar range of motion using goniometer. (Clinical Trial Registry Number: (NCT06707805)

Results: Between-group analysis demonstrated statistically significant effects of lumbar SNAGs combined with conventional therapy, showing a reduction in pain intensity (p < 0.05) and an improvement in lumbar range of motion (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusion: This study concludes that the addition of lumbar SNAGs to conventional therapy produces clinically meaningful improvements in pain reduction and lumbar mobility compared with conventional therapy alone, in the management of patients with lower-crossed syndrome.

Keywords: Conventional therapy, Lumbar SNAGs, Lower cross syndrome, NPRS, ROM

References

Burile G, Phansopkar P, Deshmukh NS, Burile GC. Prevalence of Lower Cross Syndrome in Housemaids. Cureus. 2024;16(4).

Sahu P, Phansopkar P. Screening for lower cross syndrome in asymptomatic individuals. J Med Pharm Allied Sci. 2021;10(6):3894-8.

Kandil EA, Yamany AAER, Alsaka SSD, Abd El-Azeim AS. Effect of global postural reeducation on chronic low pain patients with lower cross syndrome. Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy. 2024;29(1):8.

Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Ferreira ML, Genevay S, et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. The Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2356-67.

Ali I, Khan H, Rahman B, Nadir A, Khan HY, Ahmad M. Prevalence of lower cross syndrome and its association with bmi among nurses: a cross-sectional study. 2025.

Edwards J, Hayden J, Asbridge M, Gregoire B, Magee K. Prevalence of low back pain in emergency settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2017;18(1):143.

Key J. The Pelvic Crossed Syndromes: A reflection of imbalanced function in the myofascial envelope; a further exploration of Janda’s work. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies. 2010;14(3):299-301.

Young I, Dunning J, Escaloni J, Maselli F, Prall J, Mourad F, et al. Reliability, construct validity, responsiveness and minimum clinically important difference of the numeric pain rating scale and shoulder pain and disability index in patients with subacromial pain syndrome. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 2025:103372.

Aburub AS, Alawna M, Mohamed AA, Nassif M. Using a smartphone goniometer to measure active thoracolumbar spine range of motion of lateral flexion and rotation among people with non-specific low back pain: a reliability and validity study. International Journal of Therapy And Rehabilitation. 2025;32(5):1-13.

Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, et al. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis & rheumatism. 2012;64(6):2028-37.

Ishida H, Hirose R, Watanabe S. Comparison of changes in the contraction of the lateral abdominal muscles between the abdominal drawing-in maneuver and breathe held at the maximum expiratory level. Manual therapy. 2012;17(5):427-31.

Clark RA, Mentiplay BF, Hough E, Pua YH. Three-dimensional cameras and skeleton pose tracking for physical function assessment: A review of uses, validity, current developments and Kinect alternatives. Gait & posture. 2019;68:193-200.

Published

2026-03-29

How to Cite

1.
Shabbir A, Asghar S, Qazi RA, Khalid A, Ramzan J, Saddiqa A. Effect of Lumber Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides on Lower Cross Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Riphah Coll. Rehabili. sci. [Internet]. 2026Mar.29 [cited 2026Apr.2];14(1). Available from: https://journals.riphah.edu.pk/index.php/jrcrs/article/view/2646

Issue

Section

Original Articles