Exploring Satisfaction and Perceived Learning in Physical Therapy Students during Online Learning: A Cross-Sectional Survey
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus outbreak which occurred in 2019 brought an unprecedented transformation in the education sector, accelerating the shift from traditional face-to-face learning to online platforms. While virtual learning existed before, it was largely considered a supplementary tool rather than a primary mode of instruction. Because of the corona outbreak, all the educational institutes either deferred regular class sessions or extracurricular events. Students were experiencing major disturbances in learning and assessment in their subject areas.
Objective: To determine outcomes of online learning on student’s satisfaction and Perceived learning level.
Methodology: This was a cross- sectional survey conducted from various institutes in Rawalpindi and Islamabad. After taking ethical approval from ethical committee of foundation university Islamabad data was collected from students following inclusion criteria. Sampling technique used was non-probability convenient sampling and Sample Size was calculated using Rao soft. Data collection tool was SLE-OLE (Student Learning and Satisfaction in Online Learning Environment) questionnaire. Study duration was of six months.
Results: Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 21 version. Normality tests were applied which data was statistically significant. Total of 507 were included in study. Out of which 449 were males and 56 were females. The mean age was 21.4±1.65. Overall, 148(28.00%) students were somewhat satisfied with the overall experience of the course. 165(31.20%) were somewhat pleased with what they have learnt during the course. 138(26.10%) agreed that learning tasks enhance the understanding of the content. 152(28.70%) somewhat agreed on learning less than anticipated. 126(23.80%) slightly agreed with the skills that will help in the future.
Conclusion: Results of this study revealed that majority of students were agreed with all the constructs of satisfaction and the process of learning in an online environment of learning instrument. Findings of the study will help to identify all the factors that need to be improved in the online education system to enhance overall learning and satisfaction of Physical therapy students.
Keywords: Online learning, Perceived learning, Student Satisfaction
References
Sahu P. Closure of universities due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): impact on education and mental health of students and academic staff. Cureus. 2020;12(4).
Dias SB, Hadjileontiadou SJ, Diniz J, Hadjileontiadis LJ. DeepLMS: a deep learning predictive model for supporting online learning in the Covid-19 era. Scientific reports. 2020;10(1):1-17.
Swan K. Quality Assurance in Online Education. A Guide to Administering Distance Learning: Brill; 2021. p. 229-49.
Lim CL, Ab Jalil H, Ma'rof AM, Saad WZ. Self-Regulated Learning as a Mediator in the Relationship between Peer Learning and Online Learning Satisfaction: A Study of a Private University in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction. 2020;17(1):51-75.
Baber H. Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID-19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research. 2020;7(3):285-92.
Driscoll A, Jicha K, Hunt AN, Tichavsky L, Thompson G. Can online courses deliver in-class results? A comparison of student performance and satisfaction in an online versus a face-to-face introductory sociology course. Teaching Sociology. 2012;40(4):312-31.
Moore MG, editor Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education; 1992.
Lee J-W. Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction. The internet and higher education. 2010;13(4):277-83.
Jones P, Packham G, Miller C, Jones A. An initial evaluation of student withdrawals within an e Learning environment: The case of e College Wales. Electronic Journal of E-learning. 2004;2(1):pp106 13-pp 13.
Lapadat JC. Written interaction: A key component in online learning. Journal of computer-mediated communication. 2002;7(4):JCMC742.
Van Petegem K, Aelterman A, Rosseel Y, Creemers B. Student perception as moderator for student wellbeing. Social Indicators Research. 2007;83(3):447-63.
Beebe R, Vonderwell S, Boboc M. Emerging patterns in transferring assessment practices from f2f to online environments. Electronic Journal of e-learning. 2010;8(1):pp1 12-pp1 .
Sun L, Tang Y, Zuo W. Coronavirus pushes education online. Nature Materials. 2020;19(6):687-.
Wang C, Wang W, Wu H. Association between medical students’ prior experiences and perceptions of formal online education developed in response to COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in China. BMJ open. 2020;10(10):e041886.
Sindiani AM, Obeidat N, Alshdaifat E, Elsalem L, Alwani MM, Rawashdeh H, et al. Distance education during the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study among medical students in North of Jordan. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2020;59:186-94.
Chernosky J, Ausburn J, Curtis R. Students as Consumers: Retaining Engineering Students by Designing Learner-Centric Courses of Value. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education. 2021;69(2):100-20.
Alqurashi E. Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education. 2019;40(1):133-48.
Gray JA, DiLoreto M. The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation. 2016;11(1):n1.
Tratnik A, Urh M, Jereb E. Student satisfaction with an online and a face-to-face Business English course in a higher education context. Innovations in education and teaching international. 2019;56(1):36-45.
Raime S, Shamsudin MF, Hashim RA, Rahman NA. Students’ self-motivation and online learning students’ satisfaction among UNITAR college students. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences. 2020;2(3):62-71.
Keramidas CG. Are undergraduate students ready for online learning? A comparison of online and face-to-face sections of a course. Rural Special Education Quarterly. 2012;31(4):25-32.
Martin F, Wang C, Sadaf A. Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education. 2018;37:52-65.
Murray L, McCallum C, Petrosino C. Flipping the classroom experience: A comparison of online learning to traditional lecture. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. 2014;28(3):35-41.
Alqurashi E. Self-efficacy in online learning environments: A literature review. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER). 2016;9(1):45-52.
Cole MT, Shelley DJ, Swartz LB. Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three-year study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2014;15(6)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 All Articles are made available under a Creative Commons "Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International" license. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Copyrights on any open access article published by Journal Riphah college of Rehabilitation Science (JRCRS) are retained by the author(s). Authors retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means; provided the article is correctly cited. JRCRS does not allow commercial use of the articles published. All articles published represent the view of the authors and do not reflect the official policy of JRCRS.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
