Effects of modified constraint induced movement therapy versus proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on upper limb motor function in chronic ischemic stroke patients

Authors

  • Roshaan Sethi University Of Lahore
  • Fariha Khalid The University of Lahore
  • Mehwish Saghir The University of Lahore
  • Usama Ahmad Khan Sikander medical complex
  • Kamran Hanif

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Background:Motor function is the most important long term consideration for conservative management for post stroke patients.

Objective:To assess the effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation technique versus modified constraint induced movement therapy on upper limb motor function of the chronic ischemic stroke patients.

Methodology:It was a randomized control trial. Total number of participants was 72 (66 after dropout) of chronic stroke patients.it was a single blinded study.one group was given conventional physical therapy with PNF and other group was given conventional physical therapy with MCIMT.

Results: the participants mean age was 58.1818(PNF) and 58.3939 (MCIMT). There was no significant difference between the groups post treatment (p>0.05). A significant difference was noted post intervention (p<0.05) in both the groups. However the MCIMT group showed better scoring for both FMA and MAL .

Conclusion: The study showed that both techniques are effective improving upper limb function but MCIMT shows more favorable results.

Key Words: Stroke, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation, Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy, Motor Function

Downloads

Published

2024-06-26

How to Cite

1.
Roshaan Sethi, Khalid F, Saghir M, Khan UA, Hanif K. Effects of modified constraint induced movement therapy versus proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on upper limb motor function in chronic ischemic stroke patients. J Riphah Coll. Rehabili. sci. [Internet]. 2024Jun.26 [cited 2025Jul.18];12(2). Available from: https://journals.riphah.edu.pk/index.php/jrcrs/article/view/1947

Issue

Section

Original Articles